
If you’re a patient and you know what’s good for you, you won’t get sassy during an interview with anybody in the health care industry. Every interview is run by a gatekeeper and your compliance is key: in fact, being compliant is one of the most important skills you bring to the table. You will answer the same questions again and again and again; at some point you’ll be tempted to ask whether anybody is reading the answers. Don’t these people talk to one another? Where is all this information going? Who wants to know?
My experience as a patient tells me the interview/assessment system is very brittle, especially in outpatient settings. I’ve literally been told by licensed health care staff I need to answer a question because they have to “fill in the blank” before they can move the computer form to the next screen. The pain scale scenario I described in an earlier post is just one example of how the health care industry shapes information gathering to suit a very particular matrix; there are lots of other examples as well. Backed by research and clinical trials, information-gathering systems are rigid and mandatory, designed to yield specific types of profiles. It’s easy to see that, over time, the shape of the information determines the shape/presentation/ behavior/expectations of the patient as well as the practitioner.
Lots of ethical questions arise in this context. I’d like to look at one simple question, one every practitioner can and should ask of himself at frequent intervals: What am I going to do with this information?

We, as nurses, need to remember every question we ask increases the patient’s vulnerability. Sharing deeply personal information is not without psychic cost. Repeating the details of an assault, describing a complicated birth, reciting the list of medications that ultimately didn’t work may be simply “medical history” to YOU, but to the patient they are her life story. Patients share this intimate story believing it will advance the process of their care. Will it?
Several examples from my own experience: I’ve been asked my surgical history dozens of times. Certainly, as a “pain patient,” my response to surgery is relevant. However, NOT ONCE have I been asked any questions about my surgical experiences (such as responses to anesthesia, use of pain medication, recovery time, etc.). What are you doing with the information? Similarly, I’ve been asked to used the 1-10 pain scale rating system hundreds of times. NOT ONCE has my answer prompted any immediate nursing intervention–it literally hasn’t mattered if I rated my pain a “3″ or a “15.” My answer has been recorded, sometimes with a noticable arch of the eyebrow, but nothing else has happened. And, frankly, what are you doing with THAT information? If somebody has been in pain for five years, what do you make of the numbers on that scale?
You don’t have time to discuss the metaphysics of all your questions with every patient–I know that. But please at least have them clear in your own thinking. Maybe you just need to fill in a blank. Maybe you’re actually checking for inconsistencies, trying to “trip up” somebody you think is gaming the system. Maybe there are some questions you’d rather avoid (history of domestic assault? spiritual beliefs? to name two big ones…) and you’re just recording the information in case somebody else wants it. Maybe you’re practicing defensively, gathering information so nobody can come back and sue you. Get it straight in your own head, even if you’re not going to share all the underpinnings with your patient.
No matter what kind of “model” you use in your practice, you need to remember all patient information is ultimately subjective. Patients have hopes and expectations, some outside the limits of the industry’s ability to intervene. You may think it’s impossible to practice in a sea of ambiguity, that structures and algorithms are necessary to process data in a usable way. Maybe you’re right. Yet, the anxiety produced when needs meet resources is the place where nursing care begins. You might have to step outside the box.






